Enzo Maresca’s tactical decisions during Chelsea’s defeat to Fulham have sparked intense debate among fans. 

The manager made only one substitution in the game, bringing on Christopher Nkunku for Nicolas Jackson with about 20 minutes remaining. The move has drawn criticism, with many questioning why other options, like Joao Felix or Marc Guiu, were not utilised.

For some supporters, the issue isn’t just about Felix’s exclusion but about Nkunku’s suitability for the striker role. A growing contingent of fans believes Marc Guiu, who has impressed in the Conference League, should have been given a chance in this critical match.

Fan Reactions:

Vintage_Cfc: “Guiu was needed for this game more than Nkunku, and he would’ve definitely done more than Nkunku.”

Williams: “Honestly, there’s no point playing Nkunku in the PL again. He’s too lazy to press. Play Marc Guiu instead.”

Sripad: “So far, it feels like Guiu would have been a better sub than Nkunku today.”

InvertTheWing: “Maresca’s game management and substitutions these past two games have just been borderline dreadful. Unforgivable. The losses are largely on him. I guarantee you even small changes like Marc Guiu instead of Nkunku, both games are wins.”

Oluwaseun: “Maresca needs to bin this Nkunku-for-Jackson sub for any type of game. It was clear against Everton and clear today that Jackson going off and no actual striker replacing him just takes a lot out of us. Guiu will help occupy CBs, he will press harder, and be a threat on crosses.”

CBW: “Guiu is a much better option to bring off the bench to play CF and occupy CBs than Nkunku will ever be.”

Maresca’s decision-making in recent matches has come under fire, with fans highlighting his reluctance to rotate the squad effectively. As the team looks to bounce back, calls to integrate Guiu into the Premier League setup are growing louder. Whether Maresca will heed these suggestions remains to be seen.